Jonas, a pale-eyed, contrary, calm, intelligent and determined kid was introduced in the legislate up Giver´s nightclub by Lois Lowry; edict in which e trulybody skillful about be the selfsame(prenominal) in name of visible appearance and psychological structure, in that respect?s al counselings tightness because of fear of braking rules and being ?released? (that in this specific community manner to be killed), in that location?s a permanent nip for for perfection that r to each iodinees the point of killing the weird mass and the train and worries of individuals nuclear number 18 non heretofore taken into account and be replaced by the necessities of the whole society that may mean steganography for some of its citizens. As proved in this fictitious unless reality- base society and in score by some sound cognize collectivist res earthly concernas such as Cuba, Russia and China, there argon plenty of disadvantages collectivism brings to communities based on it. To mother with, in a collectivistic society every(prenominal)body is seen as take up of a bigger organ with specific characteristics and features that quell the same for either and sundry; for acquire that everyone is different and has assorted values and abilities, and provoking that even the most(prenominal) honest and sincere soulfulness can be considered a thieve and liar entirely because of living in a society recognized of having that variety show of people. In addition, it is great to tell that collectivism is the best way for a earth to fail economi confabulatey, since it brings with itself an economic strategy in which industries, companies and incidentories atomic number 18 suffer by the politics, so the potentially combat-ready population flora in them in vagabond to make free hospital service, public education and basic fare and cleaning tools. Then, with the financial gains, the political science pays the already described ser vices, anyways the maintenance of the count! ry; including streets, cleaning of public places, and others, and with the remaining sources it is suppositional to give good benefits to all the population, provided money neer exceeds (it is either exhausted in the country´s benefit, or it is lost in the political corruption), so the country repeals as Raul Rivero (a Cuban journalist) says in his article ?Daily Live in Cuba?; ?There is non that one Cuba. There are several. ane for the command class and another for tourists, diplomats and other abroad visitors. These cardinal are very similar. However, there is another country for those who do not receive any of the $800 million dollars sent per year to the island by Miami-based exiles, and who do not have relatives working in foreign corporations or mixed-capital enterprises. Those who are forced to live, along with their families, only with home(a) currency, with no access to dollar-based stores. This text concerns such people. Because there are other Cubans, smal ler and forgotten?. Focusing on government activity and government, it is essential to point out that although the defenders of collectivism retract it, there is not a collectivist government; every hotshot government is composed of individuals, and its decisions and activities are carried on based on intentions and actions of individuals too. On top of that, the already described scotch system that collectivism involves, makes easier political corruption to emerge, because the government has much a total control over all the monetary resources of the nation and by that means the opportunity to profit from it. In terms of genial aspects, collectivism doesn?t fulfill a very good work either. Supposedly, collectivism is stated in order to prevent and eradicate sociable classes, simply with it the only end result is having two major, big and extremely tag social divisions: politicians and diplomats, who seize the economy and seem to be the oligarchy of the state, and the nonc ombatants that in most of the cases are forced to liv! e in merciless conditions and with no more than the necessary food to stay alive. In contrast, personal identity is a social, economical and political condition that offers to each individual, that is place of the society, the possibility to be recognized as a different and unique person. Also, individuality seeks for the development and fulfillment of the necessities, worries and well-being of each individual (individualists would never sacrifice individual for the befit of the community), and it worries staggeringly about the interpersonal relationships between its members. The unite States of America, is the proof of a well developed individualist nation, and look at to capitalism (its economic system that is obviously based on individualism) has reached the point of been considered a world-wide power. Different from the collectivist´s ones, economic systems based on individualism have prospered significantly in most of the nations that have made use of them.
This is due to the fact that capitalism (the most representative individualistic system) offers each civilian the opportunity to possess private property and to own businesses or to simply look for money the way each one chooses. Then, the government just receives taxes to pay the maintenance of public places, the streets and in some cases public education and, I dare to say, that convey to the fact of having people controlling its own profits and the government not getting involved in the management of a significant part of it, capitalism has better results that the own systems of collectivism. Finally, it has to be accept ed that individualism allows very marked social class! es to emerge, but at least it lets people from the low social classes to distance themselves and success economically in the required way to ascending socially, and doesn?t snitch communities with the illusion of having a country with no social classes and that?s actually suffering the generation of two bigger ones in which there is not the possibility to overcome. To conclude, I would analogous to say that from any point of view individualism is the way for nations to develop, and that it surpasses the unstylish form of ruling (collectivism), that was almost all eradicated from the governments of the whole world, thanks to the arguments that never fail: facts; in this case, the economical, social and political clinical depression that nations suffered because of it. In addition, I would like to make a call to nations, voting population and broadly speaking to the world, to accept the reinvigorated forms and solutions that thinkers and new generations give, not only to this issue, but to every single one, because they are based on the history and registries of the things, in the problems the old forms generated and on the worry of the well-being of all. BIBLIOGRAPHY:?WIKIPEDIA, the destitute Encyclopedia. Individualism. gateway: Individualism. universal resource locator: ?WIKIPEDIA, the Free Encyclopedia. Collectivism. Entry: Collectivism. uniform resource locator: ?EBELING, Richard M. ?Competing Capitalism? and the New Rationales for Economic Collectivism. December, 1992. URL: ?STATA, Raymie. What is Individualism. 1992. URL: ?MACHAN, Tibor R. Individualism, the Collectivist?s Nemesis. February 2008. If you want to get a replete essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment